Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

Reality Check

Posted on Mar 5th, 2008 by Chris : Court Jester Chris

I went to Cleveland this past weekend to help canvas neighborhoods for the Obama campaign.  I went through two neighborhoods in two days.  Both bore the signs of a city hurting - vacant houses, many recent arrivals and departures (our voter list was almost useless), people struggling to make ends meet.

There was a superficial "this is why we're doing this" feeling, but it didn't feel deeply authentic.  What does feel authentic: I really, truly believe that an integral approach is the only way forward.  The republican solution has been reliance on the free market, or, in extreme form, denial that there's a problem at all (because if the people were really willing to work and apply themselves, they'd be doing better).  The democratic solution has been a focus on external forces - emphasis on education and government assistance, or, in extreme form, welfare.

Problem is, both those solutions are woefully partial; but both contain truths that are part of a better approach.  Long-term, an integral approach is our only chance.

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (97)  
Tagged with: obama, integral, economy, republican, democrat

A More Perfect Union

Posted on Mar 19th, 2008 by Chris : Court Jester Chris

For those of you who haven't yet heard Senator Obama's speech on race in America, "A More Perfect Union": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU

I love analyzing Senator Obama's speeches, especially when digging for integral nuggets.  Not this time.  It stands on its own.  His speech is a great example of how one person can embody, and then express, multiple perspectives, even seemingly conflicting ones, while moving towards something greater.  Add in the courage, the candor, the nuance.  Bravo.  

I have been following the news coverage, though, and I'm struck by a couple things.  One is how beautifully some people seem to 'get it' (personal favorites: Andrew Sullivan, and some of the Slate commentators).  The other is that a lot of people seem to not be able to hear it at all.  Here's a particularly stark example:

It will not do to say that Wright is "part of America." Lots of deplorable people are part of America, including white racists. Political candidates are not required to embody every strand of America, much less the most noxious hate-filled ones. Political candidates embrace the strands that speak to them, and we should embrace the political candidates whose strands of thinking speak to us. No other candidate for president contains Wright's thinking as "part of them."

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/03/020069.php

Or, in other words: "I disown voices in myself that I'm not comfortable with, rather than facing them; and everyone else should too!"  I hate to break the news, but I'm fairly certain that "strategy" won't work.  Senator Obama condemned some of his statements, but refused to disown an intelligent, generous, spiritual man defined more by his non-YouTube moments.  That's a way to move forward.

Less starkly, though, even the mainstream articles sometimes miss the mark, devolving to: "Well, he talked about Wright, and called for us to move past it, and empathized with white resentment and talked about race in America, but didn't do much to address the criticisms of Wright directly."  Which is to say: "I couldn't understand the real discussion he was reflecting back to us, embodying multiple perspectives on race in America and how those perspectives have popped up re: Wright, Ferrarro, in the media, and elsewhere.  So, all I can say is that there was lots going on and then throw in my usual political analysis at the end."  Or: "I can't take on multiple perspectives at once, so I can't understand his speech."  To their credit, though, most of these writers at least acknowledge that his speech was nuanced and honest.  They're doing their best to reflect what they can.

I have mixed feelings about all of this.  I'm afraid we can't hear enough of what Senator Obama's saying to recognize that the broad worldview he's bringing to the table is what this country (and the world) needs right now.  I'm also encouraged that he's even a viable candidate, and I know that, however long it takes, the arrow only points in one direction.

(Special thanks to Allison)

Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (93)  
Tagged with: A More Perfect Union, integral, Obama, Sullivan, race, media

Responsibility

Posted on Mar 21st, 2008 by Chris : Court Jester Chris
This article captures the sense of taking responsibility vs. playing the victim that I've noticed between Senators Obama and Clinton: http://www.slate.com/id/2187189/  An excerpt:

One of the most laudable things about Obama is that he always elects to rise above the politics of victimization. One of the most troubling things about Hillary Clinton is that she is never above cashing in on it.

I spent two days in New York and DC with Genpo Roshi, and I was reminded of the vital importance of that sense of responsibility.  In DC, in fact, it was what Roshi ended with - walking us through voices until we reach the voice that consciously chooses to be human, that consciously chooses to take responsiblity for it all.

Regardless of the worldview that one candidate or the other could bring to the table, that sense of a person owning their own strengths and weaknesses, owning all of those perspectives that they have the cognitive ability to take on, is in my mind vital to becoming a vehicle that can embody the integral worldview (or any other worldview, for that matter).  Else, we're playing in shadows as much as we're embodying a worldview.

[Please note that I also fully realize that the campaigns of all candidates have played up perceived grievances in droves; indeed, that's been one of my disappointments with the Obama campaign.  I'm speaking here, though, of my perception (and the above article's authors' perceptions, it seems) of the candidates themselves.]
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (114)  
Tagged with: obama, integral, clinton, genpo roshi, responsibility, victim, slate, perspective