Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

"Clarity vs. Nuance"

Posted on Aug 19th, 2008 by Chris : Court Jester Chris
An excellent piece from the Washington Post - all I'd add is that the Black-and-White vs. Shades-of-Gray is, in my mind, all about taking on more, bigger, and broader perspectives:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/17/AR2008081702080.html
Access_public Access: Public 1 Comment Print views (83)  
Tagged with: obama, mccain, integral

All-Quadrant Politics

Posted on Aug 28th, 2008 by Chris : Court Jester Chris
Wow - blown away by Senator Obama's approach on the world once again.  Lots of highlights from his nomination acceptance speech, but this jumped out at me:

And it is on their behalf that I intend to win this election and keep our promise alive as President of the United States.

What is that promise?

It's a promise that says each of us has the freedom to make of our own lives what we will, but that we also have the obligation to treat each other with dignity and respect.

It's a promise that says the market should reward drive and innovation and generate growth, but that businesses should live up to their responsibilities to create American jobs, look out for American workers, and play by the rules of the road.

Ours is a promise that says government cannot solve all our problems, but what it should do is that which we cannot do for ourselves – protect us from harm and provide every child a decent education; keep our water clean and our toys safe; invest in new schools and new roads and new science and technology.

Our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us, not hurt us. It should ensure opportunity not just for those with the most money and influence, but for every American who's willing to work.

That's the promise of America – the idea that we are responsible for ourselves, but that we also rise or fall as one nation; the fundamental belief that I am my brother's keeper; I am my sister's keeper.

and later:

And Democrats, we must also admit that fulfilling America's promise will require more than just money. It will require a renewed sense of responsibility from each of us to recover what John F. Kennedy called our "intellectual and moral strength." Yes, government must lead on energy independence, but each of us must do our part to make our homes and businesses more efficient. Yes, we must provide more ladders to success for young men who fall into lives of crime and despair. But we must also admit that programs alone can't replace parents; that government can't turn off the television and make a child do her homework; that fathers must take more responsibility for providing the love and guidance their children need.

Individual responsibility and mutual responsibility – that's the essence of America's promise.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/us/politics/28text-obama.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1

Or in other words - we should pay attention to the internal and the external, the individual and the community, all quadrants working together.  And government chiefly plays a part in the external and the collective, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't pay attention to it all.

Maybe it's not explicitly developmental, but otherwise, I've never heard a candidate give life to a more integral approach to politics.
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (82)  

What the Palin pick says about McCain: he lacks integrity

Posted on Aug 31st, 2008 by Chris : Court Jester Chris
I'm not going to jump conclusions about Sarah Palin.  It bothers me that so many people have already made up their minds about every qualification of someone 99% of them hadn't heard of three days ago, based on nothing more than which party she's affiliated with. 

What bothers me very much, though, is that it tells us John McCain's primary attacks on Senator Obama's - his "readiness to lead" - are based on no principle at all, save that he thought it would help him win.  It's the worst part of politics, if you ask me, and I hate that it's so blatant here and that we're apparently willing to put up with it.

A good article on the subject: http://www.slate.com/id/2199029/
Access_public Access: Public What do you think? Print views (77)